Skip to content

Convict Transportation to America: Epilogue

Note: This post is part of a series on Convict Transportation to the American colonies.

Almost as soon as British convict transportation to America ended, Americans began to downplay the numbers and significance of convicts sent to the colonies. In 1786, Thomas Jefferson led the way by claiming,

The Malefactors sent to America were not sufficient in number to merit enumeration as one class out of three which peopled America. It was at a late period of their history that the practice began. I have no book by me which enables me to point out the date of its commencement. But I do not think the whole number sent would amount to 2000 & being principally men eaten up with disease, they married seldom & propagated little. I do not suppose that themselves & their descendants are at present 4000, which is little more than one thousandth part of the whole inhabitants.

Jefferson should have known better. The British were sending nearly 1,000 convicts to America each year around the time he wrote the Declaration of Independence, and about half of them ended up in his own home state of Virginia.

Much Higher Numbers

Nineteenth-century historians participated in this cover-up as well. Most of them ignored the institution of convict transportation to America, and those who did recognize it usually claimed that most of the people who were transported were political prisoners. Not until 1896, when an article on convict transportation by J. D. Butler appeared in the American Historical Review, did this thinking begin to change. Butler pointed out that the majority of convicts shipped to America during the colonial period were decidedly not political prisoners and that their numbers were much higher than previously reported. After the appearance of Butler’s essay, historians in the twentieth century finally began to research convict transportation to America in a serious and systematic way.

Today, historians of convict transportation to America have settled on much higher numbers than those cited in the nineteenth century. Of the 585,800 immigrants to the thirteen colonies during the years 1700-1775, about 52,200 were convicts and prisoners (9 percent of the total). During these same years, slaves by far constituted the largest group of immigrants (278,400; 47%), followed by people arriving with their freedom (151,600; 26%) and indentured servants (96,600; 18%). Note that almost three quarters of all the people arriving in the American colonies during this time period did so without their freedom.

These numbers account for immigrants arriving in America from all countries during these years. When the numbers arriving in America from Great Britain are examined in isolation, the percentage of immigrants who were convicts is of course much higher. From 1718 to 1775, when the Transportation Act was in full force, convicts accounted for one-quarter of all immigrants arriving in the American colonies from the British Isles. Either way, the numbers are much higher than the “one thousandth part of the whole inhabitants” cited by Jefferson.

Short Stories, Momentous Events

This series on convict transportation to the American colonies began with the story of James Bell, who in 1723 was caught stealing a book and was sentenced to transportation for a 7 year term. Other than the description of his criminal act at his trial in the Proceedings of the Old Bailey and the appearance of his name on a convict shipping list, we do not know much more about his story. More well-known and hardened criminals were certainly transported to America, but Bell’s story is more typical of the thousands of petty thieves who received a sentence of transportation for their crime.

Even though Bell’s story of petty theft is short and lacks detail, the event turned out to be a momentous one for him. In being sentenced to transportation, he joined the ranks of thousands of others who could tell a similar story. Transportation to the American colonies constituted a major transformation in the lives of the people who received this punishment–a transformation so profound that they probably never could have conceived of what was in store for them before it actually happened to them. For what could very well have been an impulsive act, Bell was sent on an epic journey across the ocean and into the unknown.

Modern Resonances

The history of convict transportation has modern resonances that are hard to ignore. In recent years, drug crimes in the United States have soared and strict sentencing laws meant to contain such activity have led to a dramatic increased in the prison population. Today, more than 1 out of every 100 adults is now locked away behind bars in the United States. Convicts who have committed a wide range of offenses are housed in overcrowded and dangerous conditions, often with nothing to do all day. Prison gangs are rampant, and violent clashes between rival gangs and guards are common. Many prisoners have become institutionalized and see prison as their only and most comfortable way of life. This description of the state of the criminal justice system in the U.S. today is not far from what characterized England’s in the eighteenth century.

The United States is in dire need of finding new solutions to its prison problem. The cost of housing convicts is draining government coffers, and some states have even tried to contract out the management of its criminal offenders to private prisons. In the eighteenth century, England took the radical step of partnering with private firms to create a new form of criminal punishment that was surprisingly efficient in its administration. The result was convict transportation to America. Can the history of convict transportation to colonial America help the United States to rethink the way it handles its criminal offenders today? The answer to this question hinges on evaluating the success of Britain’s new system of punishment in the eighteenth century.

Winners and Losers

When convict transportation to America had reached its height after mid-century, the British government was ambivalent about the success of this enterprise and sought alternatives, although none of them proved satisfactory enough to displace it. The stories and experiences of the various groups involved in convict transportation offer different shades of light on the success of convict transportation. All of them must be taken into account when evaluating how effective the punishment ultimately was in diminishing the crime rate, rehabilitating the offenders, and establishing new lives for the convicts.

There were many winners in the practice of transportation. Convict merchants, who specialized in moving this form of human cargo across the Atlantic, made a fortune. Plantation owners were also beneficiaries of this form of punishment by taking advantage of the cheap labor that convicts provided. There were risks, to be sure. Convicts with ill temperaments could disrupt plantation life, and many convicts jeopardized plantation owners’ investment in them by escaping and running away. Even so, planters quickly bought up convicts almost as soon as they arrived in port, because they were such a bargain. The British government probably benefited the most. Not only was it able to empty its jails of convicts at minimal cost, but it could pass their convicted felons off on someone else and forget about them as soon as they set foot on American shores.

The convicts, for the most part, were the losers. Some of the transported convicts ended up thriving in their new setting. Many, however, died during their trip overseas before they even arrived in America. Others were mistreated by their new masters once they did arrive. Most of them, uprooted from their family and friends in England and shipped off to a strange land, either ran away or served out their terms before disappearing into obscurity.

Convict transportation played a significant role in the workings of colonial America. In the same way that Australia has learned to acknowledge and embrace its criminal legacy, America needs to come to terms with its similar criminal past. The history of convict transportation to colonial America asks Americans to re-examine their roots and compels them to recognize the contribution of British convicts such as James Bell in establishing and populating what would eventually become the United States.

Resources for this article:

  • Butler, James Davie. “British Convicts Shipped to American Colonies.” American Historical Review 2.1 (1896): 12-33.
  • Fogleman, Aaron S. “From Slaves, Convicts, and Servants to Free Passengers: The Transformation of Immigration in the Era of the American Revolution.” The Journal of American History 85.1 (1998): 43-76.
  • Jefferson, Thomas. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Ed. Paul Leicester Ford. Vol. IV. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1894.
  • Liptak, Adam. “More Than 1 in 100 Adults Are Now in Prison in U.S.” The New York Times Friday, February 29, 2008, National Report: A14.
  • Morgan, Kenneth. “Convict Transportation to Colonial America (Review of A. Roger Ekirch, Bound for America: The Transportation of British Convicts to the Colonies, 1718-1775).” Reviews in American History 17.1 (1989): 29-34.
  • Old Bailey Proceedings. (www.oldbaileyonline.org, 7 April 2008), January 1723, trial of James Bell (t17230116-9).

Learn More About Convict Transportation

Learn more about convict transportation to colonial America by reading my book, Bound with an Iron Chain: The Untold Story of How the British Transported 50,000 Convicts to Colonial America.

Amazon.com: Paperback ($16.99) and Kindle ($4.99).

Smashwords: All e-book formats ($4.99).

Most people know that England shipped thousands of convicts to Australia, but few are aware that colonial America was the original destination for Britain’s unwanted criminals. In the 18th century, thousands of British convicts were separated from their families, chained together in the hold of a ship, and carried off to America, sometimes for the theft of a mere handkerchief.

What happened to these convicts once they arrived in America? Did they prosper in an environment of unlimited opportunity, or were they ostracized by the other colonists? Anthony Vaver tells the stories of the petty thieves and professional criminals who were punished by being sent across the ocean to work on plantations. In bringing to life this forgotten chapter in American history, he challenges the way we think about immigration to early America.

The book also includes an appendix with helpful tips for researching individual convicts who were transported to America.

Visit Pickpocket Publishing for more details.

8 Comments

  1. Jennifer Lodine-Chaf wrote:

    I have greatly enjoyed your site. Recently an article I wrote concerning female convicts transported to Colonial America was published in the Early America Review. I thought you might be interested.
    Have a wonderful day.
    Pax,
    Jennifer Lodine-Chaffey

    Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 8:34 pm | Permalink
  2. Andy wrote:

    How many percent of Americans today are descendants of those convicts? 50 % ? probably more?

    Monday, June 21, 2010 at 5:17 pm | Permalink
  3. I am not a statistician, so I can’t really hazard a guess. Convicts accounted for nine percent of the immigrants coming to the thirteen colonies from 1700-1775. Their representation of the total population would have been much lower, since there were a substantial number of people already living and procreating in America before this time.

    Many of the convicts probably died before they could start a family, and a few probably returned to England. Even so, the raw numbers are so great that they had to have contributed significantly to the American gene pool. Certainly, people with family heritage from colonial Maryland, Virginia, and possibly the Carolinas have a greater chance of having a convict in their ancestry. But since many convicts went out of their way to cover their tracks after servitude, tracing these roots is difficult. Some people, for some reason, don’t want to discover that they are descended from a convict, and such denial can also hinder efforts to trace the convicts’ legacy.

    Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 10:10 am | Permalink
  4. Jonathan Sage wrote:

    I greatly enjoyed your book on Convict Transportation and have a question.
    James Sage, my distant relative was sentenced to 7 years transportation by the “Old Baily” for petty theft and we believe arrived in Williamsburg on the Tayloe in October 1773. He disappeared for about 4 years (I assume he was sold or had been presold) and then reappeared in late 1777 in Valley Forge as part of Capt. Crockett’s 7th Virginia Regiment fighting with the Continental Army under General Washington. I am researching how/when he was drafted for service and how he might have been relieved of his “7 year committment”. I am assuming that after 1776 the need for soldiers was great and that the states used incentives or other ways to meet the recruitment needs set by the Continental Congress. I am curious whether the Virginia Legislature might have provided some incentive for convict prisioners that might relieve them of the remainder of their contracts if they were willing to serve for a year or two in the army. Any help with this question would be greatly appreciated. It is believed that James Sage was trained in England as a baker and could read and write.

    Thanks

    Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 3:33 pm | Permalink
  5. I was able to verify that James Sage was transported to Virginia on the Tayloe in July 1773 with John Ogilvy serving as captain. Sage was convicted of grand larceny at the Old Bailey, and you can read about his trial at the Proceedings of the Old Bailey Online. He may have been lucky to receive transportation as punishment, because according to the trial report he committed burglary as well, which was a much more serious offense.

    Unfortunately, few records record where convicts ended up in America. Convicts tend to disappear from the historical record once they leave the ship, and the fact that you are able to trace your ancestor to Valley Forge is unusual.

    I highly doubt that the Virginia Legislature passed any law that specifically addressed convict servants, although it is possible that they provided incentive for the release of servants in general to serve in the Continental Army. I am not an expert on the America Revolution, so I just don’t know. Convicts with identifiable skills and who could read and write, which was the case with Sage, would have been given positions of greater authority on plantations, and consequently they generally had more control over their own destiny. Sage could have run away, although he probably would not have shown up in the army under his own name if that were the case. He could have struck a deal with his owner to let him go before his term had run out. If he brought any money with him from England, he could have “bought” reduced service time from his master at the point of sale. Or perhaps his master was such a patriot that he let Sage go in order to serve in the war.

    Thank you for sharing the story of your ancestor. I wish you luck in finding more information.

    Wednesday, September 1, 2010 at 9:48 am | Permalink
  6. In reply to the journey of James Sage, sentenced for transportation on July 7, 1773. He was placed on the Tayloe under Captain John Ogilvy as a “prisoner to be transported on July 16t, 1773. Coldham states that he Tayloe was bound for Virginia. The “Virginia Gazette” dated October 7th states; “The Tayloe, Ogilvie from London arrived in James River with 130 servants.” James was listed on the passenger manifest. This port was Williamsburg Virginia.

    The Tayloe was owned by John Tayloe and he also owned a large plantation know as Mount Airy located near Williamsburg. John was listed as one of the wealthiest planters in America and was a friend to a number of the signers of the Declaration of Independence. Tayloe had interests in mining of both iron and copper. He also raised some of the finest horseflesh in the country. There is no record of sale of the 7 years of James Sage’s indentured servanthood. I feel that with James’ ability to read and write, his mastery of baking and perhaps horse skills that he had prior to his passage from England, he may have been taken to Mount Airy rather than being sold.

    The next place that we have record of James Sage is in 1780 in what was then Montgomery County Virginia (about 300 miles west of Williamsburg) on Cripple Creek. This was both a mining community and was engaged in smelting of iron ore. Sage later purchased land on Elk Creek, about 15 air miles from Cripple Creek. His primary money crop on Elk Creek was raising fine riding horses.

    Tuesday, February 1, 2011 at 1:02 pm | Permalink
  7. laurie menna wrote:

    hi there: i am eaglery awaiting your new book re: convict transportation… my mothers maiden name was oakley, and i was able to trace the oakleys in america very far back. i am 99 percent certain that my relative, thomas oakley -or oakly- was on the convict ship patapasco merchant that landed in baltimore in 1730. what an amazement to me! now i cannot wait to find out more… he shows up as an indentured servant on a tobacco plantation!

    my question is- my records indicate that thomas oakley married and had children while an indentured servant -lucky for me since hes my direct ancestor!- have you heard of convicts being sent to plantations, product the amount of tobacco per lb that they were required to pay, while marrying and having children and free men?

    Saturday, July 2, 2011 at 8:25 pm | Permalink
  8. Lorraine Dormer wrote:

    Your page and book have been of such historical value in my research. I still cannot tie up some records for my own book on my family history. Joseph Holliday and Jane Wedgewood gave birth to my G-grandmother, Mary Anne Holliday in Hanover, CT in 1846. How could it be possible that Joseph was somehow in a penal colony in NSW, Australia? It seems none of the historians I have asked can give me any idea about this. Regards. Lorraine Dormer, Ireland

    Tuesday, November 8, 2011 at 9:39 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*

Bad Behavior has blocked 248 access attempts in the last 7 days.